1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Statik vs Anker

Head-to-head · Brand vs brand

Statik vs Anker: one good product against a whole catalogue.

Statik's argument is one 65W three-port GaN cube at an aggressive price per watt. Anker's is that it sells a correct adapter at every wattage from 20W upward, and has done so long enough for the failure data to be public.

Spec-by-spec

SpecStatikAnker
Catalogue depthNarrow — a small range centred on travel chargingDeep — dozens of models, 20W to 250W-class
Flagship product65W GaN three-port travel cubeNano compacts and Prime / 7-series desk units
Typical port layout2× USB-C, 1× USB-AAnything from 1× C to 4 mixed ports
Wattage ceilingMid-range, laptop-capableWell past 200W on desk models
Size / weight classPocket GaN cube, folding prongsSmallest-in-class at the Nano end; larger desk bricks
Input voltage100–240V, travel-ready100–240V, travel-ready
Price per wattAggressive at 65WCompetitive, rarely the cheapest
Best suited toOne-bag travellers, ultrabook plus phoneAnyone whose needs may change wattage

Where Statik wins

The 65W three-port class, on price. Sixty-five watts is the most useful single number in charging: it fast-charges any phone, runs a MacBook Air or an ultrabook at full speed, and still has enough left for a tablet on a second port. Statik's cube does that with folding prongs and 100–240V input, so with a plug adapter it is a complete travel kit — see plug adapter vs converter for why that is all you need abroad. If your requirement is one brick, three devices, in a carry-on, buying more brand is spending on catalogue you will not use.

Where Anker wins

Everywhere your needs are not exactly 65W. Anker has a correct answer at 20W, 30W, 45W, 65W, 100W, 140W and beyond, which matters because charger buying is rarely a one-time event — a new laptop moves the target. It also wins on two things a narrow catalogue cannot buy: a decade-plus of field history, and a returns process attached to mainstream retail rather than one direct-to-consumer storefront. Details on the Anker brand page and Statik brand page.

Sixty-five watts is not 65W to one device once ports fill. Three-port cubes in this class typically publish something like 45W plus 20W across two USB-C ports. If your laptop asks for the full 65W, keep the other ports empty while it charges, or size up to 100W.

Verdict

Buy Anker for most people. Not because the Statik cube is bad — it is a legitimately good 65W travel charger — but because the odds that 65W with three ports is permanently the right spec for you are low, and Anker is the brand that still has the right answer when a 14″ MacBook Pro or a 140W-class laptop arrives. Breadth plus track record plus a real support channel is worth a small premium. The exception is precise: if you want exactly one charger, exactly 65W, exactly three ports, for travel, and you are optimising cost per watt, the Statik cube is the better buy and you will not miss anything Anker offers. Compare the same argument against a bigger catalogue in Anker vs UGREEN.

  • 65W

    Statik 65W GaN 3-Port

    The Statik-side pick. Laptop-class watts, three devices, folding plug, best price per watt in the class.

    Output
    65W total
    Ports
    2× C, 1× A
    Input
    100–240V
    Best for
    Travel
    Check price on Amazon
  • 120W

    Anker 737 GaNPrime 120W

    The Anker-side pick, and the reason breadth matters: 120W covers a 14″ MacBook Pro that 65W cannot fast-charge.

    Output
    120W total
    Ports
    2× C, 1× A
    Tech
    GaN
    Best for
    Desk, larger laptops
    Check price on Amazon
  • 65W

    Anker 735 (Nano II 65W)

    Anker's direct answer to the Statik cube: same 65W three-port format, deeper support behind it.

    Output
    65W total
    Ports
    2× C, 1× A
    Plug
    Folding
    Best for
    Travel with a safety net
    Check price on Amazon

Related comparisons

FAQ

Is Statik a legitimate charger brand?

It is a direct-to-consumer accessory brand whose 65W GaN three-port charger is its best-known product. Judge it the way you would judge any brand: UL or ETL listing, a published per-port power table, and 100 to 240V input.

Can a 65W charger run a MacBook Pro?

It will run and charge a 14-inch MacBook Pro, but not at fast-charge speed — that needs 96W on the higher-end configurations. Under sustained heavy load a 65W supply may hold the battery level rather than raise it.

Which is better for international travel?

Either, as long as the label reads 100 to 240V, which both do. Pack the charger plus a plug adapter for the destination's prong shape; no voltage converter is required for USB-C chargers.